* My Telegraph 1. Home» 2. Comment» 3. Letters We must decide the areas in which ash trees are to be preserved Strategy to slow ash dieback disease. 7:00AM GMT 03 Nov 2012 Comments Comments SIR – The United Kingdom boasts several internationally significant populations of ash that require the highest levels of protection. These will be lost if we do not urgently put in place a strategy that targets these areas, at least to slow progress of the ash dieback disease. Top of the list must be the Lake District, which includes significant numbers of ash in ancient semi-natural woodlands and many hundreds of ancient pollards. Pollarding (lopping branches off trees at a height of 10 or 12ft above ground on a regular cycle) is integral to the traditional silvo-pastoral system practised for centuries throughout the region. In valleys such as Borrowdale, there are specimens hundreds of years old which provide a habitat for rare lichens, birds, bats and invertebrates. They are as much part of the landscape as the lakes, Herdwick sheep and vernacular architecture. Our experience with Dutch elm disease, foot and mouth, and red squirrel conservation, tells us that core populations need to be identified and targeted at the earliest possible stage in an outbreak. Edward R Wilson Forest Scientist Director Silviculture Research International Penrith, Cumbria -- Ibrahim Hewitt Senior Editor, Middle East Monitor London NW10 The right side SIR – As a poppy seller, I am often asked which side a woman should wear hers. I always say the right side. However, more women seem to be wearing them on the left. Can anyone tell me the correct side? Anthony Messenger Windsor, Berkshire -- because they are afraid of recriminations. This fear is all the more reason to support the Liverpool Care Pathway. The timing of when to introduce the Pathway is critical; it is not guesswork, as has been suggested. It is about sound clinical judgment that comes with experience. Healthcare workers should have the common sense and sensitivity to obtain consent from relatives in advance, and to ensure that relatives understand that the pathway is about relieving pain and suffering so that there can be dignity as life ebbs away. Relatives should be encouraged to understand the needs of the dying and not their own needs. You give examples of the Pathway being withdrawn and a patient living a further two weeks. However, no mention is made of the suffering that the person almost certainly experienced before finally dying. Who benefited from those two weeks? I am sure it was not the patient.