____________________ * News & Politics * Tech * Business * Arts * Life * Health & Science * Sports * Double X * Podcasts * Photos * Video * Slatest * Blogs * MySlate * 99+ * Future Tense The Citizen's Guide to the Future «OLDER Study Offers Possible Explanation for the Huge Gender Gap in Science and Math NEWER » Finally: Robots Perform "Bohemian Rhapsody" Why Does the U.K.’s New Internet Surveillance Plan Cost Nearly $4 Billion? By Ryan Gallagher | Posted Monday, June 18, 2012, at 11:12 AM ET Share on Facebook Tweet [mySlateLogoBubble.png] MYSLATE [close.jpg] [ ] Save this story. [ ] Follow all Future Tense articles. [ ] Follow the Future Tense blog. [ ] Follow stories by Ryan Gallagher. [saveChanges.png] [close.jpg] [mySlateLogoSmall.png] MySlate is a new tool that lets you track your favorite parts of Slate. You can follow authors and sections, track comment threads you're interested in, and more. [go.png] How much does it cost to monitor every communication flowing through a country? Last week, the British government published its controversial Communications Data Bill—or “snoopers’ charter,” as it has been widely dubbed—which would force U.K. telecoms firms to store records about activity on social network sites, webmail, internet phone calls (like Skype), and online gaming for up to a year. The legislation, which could involve fitting “black-box” probes within the communications infrastructure to make data available in near real time, has been attacked by civil liberties groups that have drawn comparisons with mass surveillance systems used by authoritarian rulers in places like Belarus, China, and Iran. Many of the technical details about the plan remain unknown at this early stage, but the huge cost of the program itself is highly revealing. The new surveillance infrastructure would cost up to £2.5 billion ($3.9 billion) over the next decade, according to the Financial Times. It’s difficult to find any other monitoring schemes that come close to $3.9 billion, which hints at the true size of the British project. An Internet surveillance programme the Canadian government wants to legislate, very similar in every way to the U.K.’s, is reportedly priced at about $160 million for the first four years. A surveillance scheme in India that would “monitor all web traffic passing through Internet service providers in the country” is also predicted to cost $160 million. Other surveillance systems, including those enabling total interception of everything from voice calls to emails and text messages, are equally affordable in comparison. Last year it was revealed Syria had cut a $17.9 million deal with a series of telecoms firms that would give the Assad regime the “power to intercept, scan and catalog virtually every e-mail that flows through the country.” A monitoring system for "strategic nationwide interception" of Internet communications was purchased by Muammar Gaddafi’s Libya for little over $25 million. And Iran paid $130.6 million as part of a contract for a mass monitoring system that can reportedly "locate users, intercept their voice, text messaging ... emails, chat conversations or web access." Even the cost of setting up China’s “Great Firewall”—the most famous of all Internet monitoring systems—is reported to have cost less than $1 billion. And one of the biggest spy centers being built in the western world, the National Security Agency’s Utah Data Center, is billed at $2 billion, a little more than half of the estimated cost establishing the U.K. program. Why does the cost of the U.K.’s surveillance regime seem so disproportionately high? One reason is undoubtedly because it has agreed to pay telecoms firms to upgrade their existing infrastructure so they are able to accumulate the desired data. Another factor might be that the scale of the nationwide monitoring system is far greater the government has so far been willing to publicly acknowledge. Or perhaps—and it wouldn’t be for the first time—the brains behind the initiative have just dramatically failed to shop around. Want more of your favorite content on the MSN homepage? Try the news, sports or entertainment editons. Share on Facebook Tweet [mySlateLogoSmall.png] __________________________________________________________________ «OLDER Study Offers Possible Explanation for the Huge Gender Gap in Science and Math NEWER » Finally: Robots Perform "Bohemian Rhapsody" SLATE'S MOST VIRAL * Pope Benedict’s Abdication Should Remind Us of Long-Standing Allegations Against the Church * This 1922 Kodachrome Test Footage is Strangely Bewitching * Pope Stuns World, Snubs Twitter in Latin Click here to load comments. __________________________________________________________________ « PREV NEXT » __________________________________________________________________ Follow RSS Will Oremus is the lead blogger for Future Tense, reporting on emerging technologies, tech policy, and digital culture. Future Tense is a project from Slate, the New America Foundation, and Arizona State University. [BIO_oremus-will-2011.jpg] * * * * * * 1. Explainer Answers Your Papal Resignation Questions By L.V. Anderson | February 11, 2013 * 2. Pope Benedict’s Abdication Should Remind Us of Long-Standing Allegations Against the Church By Christopher Hitchens | February 11, 2013 * 3. Help! There’s a Dead Guy Who Looks Exactly Like Me. Did I Have a Secret Twin? By Emily Yoffe | February 11, 2013 * 4. SI's Swimsuit Issue Reaches Out to Female Readers With ... Beauty Tips. Where Are the Guys In Speedos? By Amanda Hess | February 11, 2013 * 5. Navy SEAL Recalls Moment He Killed Bin Laden By Josh Voorhees | February 11, 2013 * 1. Pope Benedict’s Abdication Should Remind Us of Long-Standing Allegations Against the Church By Christopher Hitchens | February 11, 2013 * 2. This 1922 Kodachrome Test Footage is Strangely Bewitching By Joan Neuberger | February 8, 2013 * 3. Pope Stuns World, Snubs Twitter in Latin By Josh Voorhees | February 11, 2013 * 4. The Story Behind the Last Papal Resignation By Abby Ohlheiser | February 11, 2013 * 5. Fox News Claims Solar Won't Work in America Because It's Not Sunny Like Germany By Will Oremus | February 7, 2013 * Ars Technica * Atlantic Technology Coverage * Boing Boing * Cross-Check * Danger Room * Edge.org * Electronic Frontier Foundation * Engadget * Ethical Technology * Futurisms * Guardian Notes & Theories * Gizmodo * IO9 * Kurzweil AI * The Loom * Mind Hacks * Nature News Blog * Not Exactly Rocket Science * President’s Bioethics Commission Blog * Robot Overlords * Science Insider * Science Not Fiction * Science Progress * Science Punk * SmartPlanet * Technology Review * Technosociology * Threat Level * Wired Science * Hitchens Archive: Pope Benedict's Entire Career Has the Stench of Evil About It * Who Will Be the Next Pope? Here Are the Front-Runners. * * Why Small-Business Owners Are a Grumpy and Pessimistic Lot * The Problem With Telling People To Rest More So They Can Work Harder [facebook_man_rightrail.gif] Discover Slate With Your Friends See what your friends are reading and automatically share how you're browsing Slate. You control what gets published to your Facebook News Feed. [enableSocialReading.png] Social Reading is Turn ON Turn OFF Feedback < newer | older > To temporarily turn off Social Reading, toggle the social reading button to OFF at the top of this box or in the toolbar areas of this page. This will allow you to see what your friends have read but won't show your reading activity on Slate. [ ] Always notify me when I've shared an article. LOG INTO FACEBOOK To enable Social Reading on Slate, log into... [ Cancel | OK ] * Hitchens Archive: Pope Benedict's Entire Career Has the Stench of Evil About It * Who Will Be the Next Pope? Here Are the Front-Runners. * Why Small-Business Owners Are a Grumpy and Pessimistic Lot * The Problem With Telling People To Rest More So They Can Work Harder * Will the Pope Get a Pension? Is He Still Infallible? Answers to All Your Pope Questions. * A Way To Make Drone Attacks Legal about us | contact us | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Discussion and Submission Guidelines | Slate on Facebook | ad choices feedback | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile | make Slate your homepage Slate is published by The Slate Group, a Division of the Washington Post Company All contents © 2013 The Slate Group, LLC. All rights reserved.