#publisher * More from The Economist + The Economist digital editions + Newsletters + Events + Jobs.Economist.com + The Economist Store * Subscription + Subscribe to The Economist + Manage my subscription + Renew * Log in or register Search this site: _______________ Search The Economist * World politics + Politics this week + United States + Britain + Europe + China + Asia + Americas + Middle East & Africa * Business & finance + All Business & finance + Which MBA? + Business Books Quarterly * Economics + All Economics + Economics by invitation + Economics A-Z + Markets & data * Science & technology + All Science & technology + Technology Quarterly * Culture + All Culture + More Intelligent Life + Style guide + The Economist Quiz + Book reviews * Blogs + Latest blog posts + Erasmus + Analects + Feast and famine + Americas view + Free exchange + Babbage + Game theory + Banyan + Graphic detail + Baobab + Gulliver + Blighty + Newsbook + Buttonwood's notebook + Pomegranate + Cassandra + Prospero + Charlemagne + Schumpeter + Democracy in America + The Economist explains + Eastern approaches * Debate + Economist debates + What the world thinks + Economics by invitation + Letters to the editor * Multimedia + Multimedia library + World + Business & economics + Science & technology + Culture + Events + The Economist in audio * Print edition + Current issue + Previous issues + Special reports + Politics this week + Business this week + Leaders + KAL's cartoon + Obituaries This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our cookies information for more details This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our cookies information for more details This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our cookies information for more details This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our cookies information for more details This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our cookies information for more details This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our cookies information for more details This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our cookies information for more details This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our cookies information for more details Tax havens The missing $20 trillion How to stop companies and people dodging tax, in Delaware as well as Grand Cayman Feb 16th 2013 | From the print edition * * Tweet CIVILISATION works only if those who enjoy its benefits are also prepared to pay their share of the costs. People and companies that avoid tax are therefore unpopular at the best of times, so it is not surprising that when governments and individuals everywhere are scrimping to pay their bills, attacks are mounting on tax havens and those that use them. In Europe the anger has focused on big firms. Amazon and Starbucks have faced consumer boycotts for using clever accounting tricks to book profits in tax havens while reducing their bills in the countries where they do business. David Cameron has put tackling corporate tax-avoidance at the top of the G8 agenda. America has taken aim at tax-dodging individuals and the banks that help them. Congress has passed the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), which forces foreign financial firms to disclose their American clients. Any whiff of offshore funds has become a political liability. During last year’s presidential campaign Mitt Romney was excoriated by Democrats for his holdings in the Cayman Islands. Now Jack Lew, Barack Obama’s nominee for treasury secretary, is under fire for once having an interest in a Cayman fund. In this section * The missing $20 trillion * Who can save Italy? * Phoney currency wars * Come on, TTIP * Grey squirrels Reprints Related topics * Starbucks * Barack Obama * Miami * Delaware * Cayman Islands Getting rich people to pay their dues is an admirable ambition, but this attack is both hypocritical and misguided. It may be good populist politics, but leaders who want to make their countries work better should focus instead on cleaning up their own back yards and reforming their tax systems. Dodgy of Delaware The archetypal tax haven may be a palm-fringed island, but as our special report this week makes clear, there is nothing small about offshore finance. If you define a tax haven as a place that tries to attract non-resident funds by offering light regulation, low (or zero) taxation and secrecy, then the world has 50-60 such havens. These serve as domiciles for more than 2m companies and thousands of banks, funds and insurers. Nobody really knows how much money is stashed away: estimates vary from way below to way above $20 trillion. Not all these havens are in sunny climes; indeed not all are technically offshore. Mr Obama likes to cite Ugland House, a building in the Cayman Islands that is officially home to 18,000 companies, as the epitome of a rigged system. But Ugland House is not a patch on Delaware (population 917,092), which is home to 945,000 companies, many of which are dodgy shells. Miami is a massive offshore banking centre, offering depositors from emerging markets the sort of protection from prying eyes that their home countries can no longer get away with. The City of London, which pioneered offshore currency trading in the 1950s, still specialises in helping non-residents get around the rules. British shell companies and limited-liability partnerships regularly crop up in criminal cases. London is no better than the Cayman Islands when it comes to controls against money laundering. Other European Union countries are global hubs for a different sort of tax avoidance: companies divert profits to brass-plate subsidiaries in low-tax Luxembourg, Ireland and the Netherlands. Reform should thus focus on rich-world financial centres as well as Caribbean islands, and should distinguish between illegal activities (laundering and outright tax evasion) and legal ones (fancy accounting to avoid tax). The best weapon against illegal activities is transparency, which boils down to collecting more information and sharing it better. Thanks in large part to America’s FATCA, small offshore centres are handing over more data to their clients’ home countries—while America remains shamefully reluctant to share information with the Latin American countries whose citizens hold deposits in Miami. That must change. Everyone could do more to crack down on the use of nominee shareholders and directors to hide the provenance of money. And they should make sure that information about the true “beneficial” owners of companies is collected, kept up-to-date and made more readily available to investigators in cases of suspected wrongdoing. There are costs to openness, but they are outweighed by the benefits of shining light on the shady corners of finance. Want more tax? Lower the tax rate Transparency will also help curb the more aggressive forms of corporate tax avoidance. As Starbucks’s experience has shown, companies that shift money around to minimise their tax bills endanger their reputations. The more information consumers have about such dodges, the better. Moral pressure is not the whole answer, though: consumers get bored with campaigns, and governments should not bash companies for trying to reduce their tax bills, if they do so legally. In the end, tax systems must be reformed. Governments need to make it harder for companies to use internal (“transfer”) pricing to avoid tax. Companies should be made to book activity where it actually takes place. Several federal economies, including America, already prevent companies from exploiting the differences between states’ rules. An international agreement along those lines is needed. Governments also need to lower corporate tax rates. Tapping companies is inefficient: firms pass the burden on to others. Better to tax directly those who ultimately pay—whether owners of capital, workers or consumers. Nor do corporate taxes raise much money: barely more than 2% of GDP (8.5% of tax revenue) in America and 2.7% in Britain. Abolishing corporate tax would create its own problems, as it would encourage rich people to turn themselves into companies. But a lower rate on a broader base, combined with vigilance by the tax authorities, would be more efficient and would probably raise more revenue: America, whose companies face one of the rich world’s highest corporate-tax rates on their worldwide income, also has some of the most energetic tax-avoiders. These reforms would not be easy. Governments that try to lower corporate tax rates will be accused of caving in to blackmailing capitalists. Financial centres and incorporation hubs, from the City of London to Delaware, will fight any attempt to tighten their rules. But if politicians really want to tax the missing $20 trillion, that’s where they should start. From the print edition: Leaders * Recommend 242 * * Tweet * Submit to reddit * * View all comments (185) Related items TOPIC: Starbucks » * Business this week * America's tea revolution: A nation rediscovers its old drinking habits * Business this week TOPIC: Barack Obama » * NSA snooping: Judge v spies * Inequality: A defining issue, for poor people * The politics of low pay: Raising the floor TOPIC: Miami » * Stealing from the government: SIRF’s up * Scandal in college football: Mr Pot, meet Mr Kettle * Onshore financial centres: Not a palm tree in sight TOPIC: Delaware » * Delaware’s corporate courts: A new judicial boss * A memo to the world’s dictators: Subject: Asset protection and regime change * Education: Value-added remodelling More related topics: * Cayman Islands * United States * Taxes Want more? Subscribe to The Economist and get the week's most relevant news and analysis. * Comment (185) * Print * E-mail * Reprints & permissions * Advertisement Follow The Economist * Facebook * Twitter Follow @TheEconomist * Linked in Follow * Google plus * Tumblr Follow * Pinterest Follow * YouTube Follow * RSS RSS feeds by section & topic Excerpts from the print edition & blogs » * Mail Free e-mail newsletters Editor's Highlights, The World This Week, and more » Latest blog posts - All times are GMT [_0017_baobab.png] Madagascar's election: A nervous wait Baobab December 30th, 16:55 [_0020_east_approaches.png] Terrorism in Russia: A threat made real Eastern approaches December 30th, 15:41 [_0007_graphicdetail.png] Daily chart: Less is Moore Graphic detail December 30th, 12:05 [_0003_casandra.png] Transistors: Moore or less Cassandra December 30th, 11:43 [_0006_guliver.png] Airline food: Is airline food taking off? Gulliver December 30th, 10:45 [_0025_americas_view.png] Recommended Americas reading: The reading list Americas view December 30th, 10:29 [_0024_babbagw.png] Allergies: A rash of Euroenthusiasm Babbage December 30th, 9:16 More from our blogs » Most popular * Recommended * Commented Recommended * The 2013 Daily chart Advent calendar 1Christmas countdownThe 2013 Daily chart Advent calendar * 2Japan's shrine and regional tensions: See you at Yasukuni * 3South Sudan: The descent into civil war * 4Libertarian enclaves: Bitcoin paradise * 5The year ahead: Politics and sport in 2014: A tepid rebellion Commented * See you at Yasukuni 1Japan's shrine and regional tensionsSee you at Yasukuni * 2The battle for euro-zone reforms: Angela all alone * 3French culture: Bleak chic * 4Giving birth to God: A wonder beyond gender? * 5Russia and Ukraine: Putin’s expensive victory Advertisement Products & events Stay informed today and every day Get e-mail newsletters Subscribe to The Economist's free e-mail newsletters and alerts. Follow The Economist on Twitter Subscribe to The Economist's latest article postings on Twitter Follow The Economist on Facebook See a selection of The Economist's articles, events, topical videos and debates on Facebook. Advertisement Classified ads IFRAME: http://ad.doubleclick.net/N5605/adi/teg.fmsq/pfw6/a;subs=n;wsub=n;sdn=n ;!c=21571873;pos=button1;sz=125x125;ord=642129894? IFRAME: http://ad.doubleclick.net/N5605/adi/teg.fmsq/pfw6/a;subs=n;wsub=n;sdn=n ;!c=21571873;pos=button2;sz=125x125;ord=642129894? IFRAME: http://ad.doubleclick.net/N5605/adi/teg.fmsq/pfw6/a;subs=n;wsub=n;sdn=n ;!c=21571873;pos=button3;sz=125x125;ord=642129894? IFRAME: http://ad.doubleclick.net/N5605/adi/teg.fmsq/pfw6/a;subs=n;wsub=n;sdn=n ;!c=21571873;pos=button4;sz=125x125;ord=642129894? IFRAME: http://ad.doubleclick.net/N5605/adi/teg.fmsq/pfw6/a;subs=n;wsub=n;sdn=n ;!c=21571873;pos=button5;sz=125x125;ord=642129894? IFRAME: http://ad.doubleclick.net/N5605/adi/teg.fmsq/pfw6/a;subs=n;wsub=n;sdn=n ;!c=21571873;pos=button6;sz=125x125;ord=642129894? The Economist * Contact us * Help * My account * Subscribe * Print edition * Digital editions * Events * Jobs.Economist.com Sections * United States * Britain * Europe * China * Asia * Americas * Middle East & Africa * Business & finance * Economics * Markets & data * Science & technology * Culture * Multimedia library Debate and discussion * The Economist debates * What the world thinks * Letters to the editor * The Economist Quiz Blogs * Americas view * Analects * Babbage * Banyan * Baobab * Blighty * Buttonwood's notebook * Cassandra * Charlemagne * Democracy in America * Eastern approaches * Erasmus * Feast and famine * Free exchange * Game theory * Graphic detail * Gulliver * Newsbook * Pomegranate * Prospero * Schumpeter * The Economist explains Research and insights * Topics * Economics A-Z * Special reports * Style guide * The World in 2014 * Which MBA? * The Economist GMAT Tutor * Reprints and permissions The Economist Group » * The Economist Intelligence Unit * The Economist Intelligence Unit Store * The Economist Corporate Network * Ideas People Media * Intelligent Life * Roll Call * CQ * EuroFinance * The Economist Store View complete site index » * Contact us * Help * About us * Advertise with us * Editorial Staff * Staff Books * Careers * Site index * [+] Site Feedback * Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2013. All rights reserved. * Accessibility * Privacy policy * Cookies info * Terms of use Quantcast