Slate Search When the Media Compliments a Female Politician's Looks, She Loses the Election [facebook-s] Slate Sign In Sign Up Search Slate The XX Factor What Women Really Think April 8 2013 11:24 AM When the Media Compliments a Female Politician's Looks, She Loses the Election [facebook-s] By Amanda Hess 148336970 Don't hate her (just) because she's beautiful. Photo by Bill Pugliano/Getty Images President Obama apologized last week for introducing California’s Kamala Harris as “by far, the best-looking attorney general” in the country. But the president isn’t the only one who recognizes an attractive politician when he sees her. This election cycle, a prominent South Carolina Republican feels threatened by congressional candidate Elizabeth Colbert Busch: “Everybody is really concerned because she’s not a bad-looking lady,” he said. When Ashley Judd briefly considered a bid for the Senate, Dave Weigel noted one of the actress-turned-politican’s main advantages: “readers of popular websites like to click on photos of attractive women.” And Maureen Dowd thinks Hillary Clinton’s fabulous haircut is indicative of her chances in 2016: “her new haircut sends a signal of shimmering intention,” Dowd says. Hillary “has ditched the skinned-back bun that gave her the air of a K.G.B. villainess in a Bond movie and has a sleek new layered cut that looks modern and glamorous.” The implication is that the better a woman looks, the better she’ll fare in the horse race. Today, Name It. Change It. released a study showing that when the media focuses on a female politician’s appearance, voters actually vacate her in droves. This spring, the organization staged a “hypothetical congressional contest between female candidate Jane Smith and male candidate Dan Jones,” presented a series of fake news stories about each candidate to 1,500 likely U.S. voters, then asked participants how they’d cast their vote. Voters who heard a pair of mundane stories that detailed Jane and Dan’s responses to an education bill split their votes pretty evenly between the two candidates. But when voters heard stories that sneaked in references to Jane’s physical appearance, Jane lost serious ground to Dan. Even when discussion of female politicians’ appearance is coded as a “compliment,” it damages her chances. Voters lost confidence in Jane whether the coverage of her looks was neutral, ostensibly flattering, or just plain mean. In the control group that didn’t hear about Jane’s appearance, she earned the support of 50 percent of voters. When the news story included a neutral appraisal of her appearance—“Smith dressed in a brown blouse, black skirt, and modest pumps with a short heel”—she lost four points. The flattering coverage—“In person, Smith is fit and attractive and looks even younger than her age. At the press conference, smartly turned out in a ruffled jacket, pencil skirt, and fashionable high heels”—lost her six points. And the negative coverage of her looks—“At the press conference Smith unfortunately sported a heavy layer of foundation and powder that had sealed into her forehead lines, creating an unflattering look for an otherwise pretty woman, along with her famous fake, tacky nails”—lost her seven points. Voters who heard news reports about Jane’s looks rated her less “in touch,” “likeable,” “confident,” “effective,” and “qualified.” That was true even among Jane's base —though young women initially supported Jane by a huge margin, focus on her blouses and heels and nails turned them off from their candidate. Name It. Change It.’s report didn’t run a similar experiment for coverage of Dan’s looks, so we don’t know how praise of his cuticle maintenance would have affected his chances. But we do know that despite President Obama’s commitment to equal-opportunity physical flattery, female candidates contend with far more superficial coverage of their campaigns than do men, and that seriously undermines their success. In Women for President: Media Bias in Nine Campaigns, Erika Falk examined media coverage of every female presidential candidate in American history, from Victoria Woodhull in 1872 to Hillary Clinton in 2008. Female candidates were subjected to four times the appearance-based coverage that male candidates were. And the trend didn’t budge across the 136-year sample: Journalists in 2004 described Carol Moseley Braun’s body more frequently than journalists in 1872 touched on Woodhull’s looks. Independent studies have found similar gender discrepancies in media coverage of 2008 vice presidential candidates Sarah Palin and Joe Biden, and 2000 presidential contenders Elizabeth Dole, George W. Bush, Steve Forbes, and John McCain. This type of coverage is a media problem, not a Jane Smith problem. But Jane can help reverse her losses when she refuses to take these “compliments” about her looks. Name It. Change It. went on to find that when Jane and outside media commenters point out that looks-based coverage “has no place in the media and that her appearance is not news,” Jane can regain most—but not all—of her losses from the physical fixation. And “even voters who had not heard the appearance descriptions respond positively to the woman candidate standing up for herself.” Dan’s support, meanwhile, remains constant throughout the kerfuffle. When Obama pointed attention to Kamala Harris’ looks, Politico media reporter Dylan Byers asked, “How did it become so difficult to call a woman good looking in public?” Name It. Change It.’s report suggests that it’s relatively easy for media commentators like Byers to call a woman hot—they just make it very hard for that woman to win. Amanda Hess is a freelance writer and DoubleX contributor. She lives in Los Angeles. Tweet at her @amandahess. REPRINT PRINT EMAIL [facebook-s] Load Comments Powered by Livefyre Slate Sign In Sign Up Search Most Read • 1. Why Snowden Won’t (and Shouldn’t) Get Clemency • 2. The Rich Think They’re Superior. That’s Deluded and Dangerous. • 3. Wait, This Is the Guy We're Trusting With Our Naked Selfies? • 4. Help! My Daughter Is in Love With My Son’s Boyfriend. • 5. Ruth Marcus, David Brooks, and Reefer Madness Most Shared • 1. Why Snowden Won’t (and Shouldn’t) Get Clemency • 2. Ruth Marcus, David Brooks, and Reefer Madness • 3. Big Data Reveals That Basketball, Football, and Hockey Are All the Same Game • 4. How Tiny, Struggling Southern New Hampshire University has become the Amazon of Higher Education • 5. The Rich Think They’re Superior. That’s Deluded and Dangerous. [78144477_3] Dogs Align With Earth's Magnetic Field While Pooping War Stories Jan. 3 2014 2:54 PMWhy Snowden Won’t (and Shouldn’t) Get Clemency Science Jan. 3 2014 11:52 AMThe Rich Think They’re Superior. That’s Deluded and Dangerous. Outward Jan. 2 2014 2:56 PMOutward Explainer: What’s With Lesbians and Subarus?Izzy Rode [footer-top] Slate Book Club APRIL - THE BLUE FOX [footer-top] Slate Live Events APRIL 26 - DEAR PRUDENCE NYC [footer-top] Slate Store NEW SPRING SHIRTS [footer-top] Slate Membership VIP ACCESS FOLLOW SLATE [yellow-twi] [yellow-fac] SLATE ON IPAD IPHONE ANDROID KINDLE REPRINTS ADVERTISE WITH US • ABOUT US • CONTACT US • WORK WITH US • USER AGREEMENT • PRIVACY POLICY • FAQ • FEEDBACK • CORRECTIONS • PHOTO COVER CREDITS • [the-slate-] • [the-root-l] • Slate is published by The Slate Group, a Graham Holdings Company. All contents © 2013 The Slate Group, LLC. All rights reserved. Slate Sign In Sign Up Search [ ] [Search] [ ] This will never be shared [ ] This will appear when you post on the site [ ] [Create Free Account] [ ] Forgot Username or Password? [ ] [Go] OR Facebook Twitter Google [ ] War Stories [140103_WAR] Why Snowden Won’t (and Shouldn’t) Get Clemency The Rich Think They’re Superior. That’s Deluded and Dangerous. Wait, This Is the Guy We're Trusting With Our Naked Selfies? Help! My Daughter Is in Love With My Son’s Boyfriend. Ruth Marcus, David Brooks, and Reefer Madness Outward [127763486] Should Infant Sex Assignment Surgery Be Illegal? Slatest PM: The Merging Battlefields of Iraq and Syria And Now, a Musical Tribute to Ben Bernanke (VIDEO) See All the Newsmakers and Hit Makers of 2013 in Four Dizzying Minutes Corporate Partners Save NFL From Blackout Black Eye VIEW ALL War Stories [140103_WAR] Why Snowden Won’t (and Shouldn’t) Get Clemency More Than 100 Million Indians Escaped Poverty Under Manmohan Singh. He Will Be Remembered As a Failure. Ruth Marcus, David Brooks, and Reefer Madness What Does Elephant Poaching Have to Do With Infant Mortality? VIEW ALL See All the Newsmakers and Hit Makers of 2013 in Four Dizzying Minutes How They Made Gravity Veronica Mars Movie Beginning to Resemble Veronica Mars the Show (in a Good Way) Diplo Made the Ultimate Year-End Mix VIEW ALL Future Tense [180205469] Wait, This Is the Guy We're Trusting With Our Naked Selfies? Forecasting Contest: What Do You Think Will Happen in 2014? Is Facebook Reading Your Private Messages? What the Heck Was the Stanford Band Doing in its Rose Bowl Halftime Show? VIEW ALL Moneybox [457860651] And Now, a Musical Tribute to Ben Bernanke (VIDEO) Michael Aronstein Poised to Get Rich Off Inflation Derp Tina Brown Says Pot Leaves Us Unable to Compete With China Why Cambodian Cops Are Shooting Garment Workers Over the Minimum Wage VIEW ALL The Vault [Stonehenge] Some of the Earliest Maps of Stonehenge, Made by a Druid-Obsessed English Vicar The Genius Behind elBulli Sketches Out His Creative Process Michigan Requires State Employees to Refuse Service to Gay People Should Professors Be Fired for Speaking Their Minds on Twitter? VIEW ALL Science [131125_SCI] The Rich Think They’re Superior. That’s Deluded and Dangerous. Our Squeamishness About Food Is Harming Our Animals Zero G Day Is Tomorrow! Yeah, Except Not So Much, Or At All. The National Science Foundation Sent a Poet to Antarctica. Here’s What She Wrote. VIEW ALL The XX Factor [1388769821] New Year’s Resolutions Are Lame. Bring Back the Peacock Vow! "Workout Wear Friday" Is a Terrible Idea. Do Not Do It, America. Maine GOP Primary Challenger Cites Domestic Violence Conviction as a Reason to Trust Him Why Don't Single Sitcom Characters Date Online? VIEW ALL Sports Nut [140102_SN_] Big Data Reveals That Basketball, Football, and Hockey Are All the Same Game It’s Time to Evict Big-Time Sports from American Higher Education How Impressive Was Matt Prater’s NFL Record 64-Yard Field Goal? How Will the United States Fare in the World Cup’s Group of Death? VIEW ALL Video [78144477_3] Dogs Align With Earth's Magnetic Field While Pooping What Do French Fries Taste Like On Jupiter? Where In Your Body Do You Feel Love? Earth Might Be Heating Up Faster Than We Thought VIEW ALL Behold [Serge] Finding God in Maximum Security Prison The Gorgeous, Subtle Changes on the South Carolina Coast Slate’s Most Popular Photo Stories of 2013 The Homes of Hoarders Culture Gabfest [PODCAST_cu] Has the BBC drama Call the Midwife Dethroned Downton Abbey? Lexicon Valley: Why Is No Among a Child's First Words? Collision Low Crossers Is an Instant Classic on Life in the NFL Would You Rather Be Funnier or Smarter? VIEW ALL • POPULAR • RECENT • NEWS & POLITICS • ARTS • TECHNOLOGY • BUSINESS • LIFE • HEALTH & SCIENCE • DOUBLE X • SPORTS • VIDEO • PHOTOS • PODCASTS Follow Slate • NORTH KOREA • GUN CONTROL • SEX • BOSTON • IMMIGRATION • BOSTON • NORTH KOREA • BOSTON Voices • Emily Bazelon • John Dickerson • Simon Doonan • Daniel Engber • Fred Kaplan • Josh Levin • Dahlia Lithwick • Willa Paskin • Troy Patterson • William Saletan • Dana Stevens • Seth Stevenson • David Weigel • Matthew Yglesias • Emily Yoffe Blogs • Atlas Obscura • Bad Astronomy • Behold • Brow Beat • Crime • The Eye • Future Tense • Lexicon Valley • Moneybox • Outward • Quora • The Vault • The World • Weigel • Wild Things • The XX Factor • The Slatest Sign Up Sign In YOUR RECOMMENDED STORIES Slate Sign In Sign Up Search