Fichier de travail (INPUT) : ../DUMP-TEXT/enGB_26-utf8.txt
Encodage utilisé (INPUT) : utf-8
Forme recherchée : [Ss]ame[\s-][Ss]ex [Mm]arriages?
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Ligne n°36 : If accepted, the change to the law could lead to the reign of an openly gay or lesbian king or queen and for their same-sex partner to be recognised as consort. Any children born to the couple through artificial insemination or surrogacy would succeed to the throne so long as the couple are in a same-sex marriage or civil partnership. Current inheritance laws mean that if the couple had a child through adoption, they would not join the line of succession for the throne and it is not clear MPs would seek to change this.
- Ligne n°38 : In order to secure a full debate, the amendment needs to be accepted by John Bercow, the speaker of the House of Commons, almost certain as he is a strong supporter of LGBT rights. It is expected to have the support of many Labour, Liberal Democrats and most Conservatives that back David Cameron’s plans to introduce same-sex marriage.
- Ligne n°40 : The sticky wicket in this whole business is that the king or queen of England is also the titular head of the Church of England, which officially opposed same-sex marriage. One positive omen is that the rules of succession have already been amended recently to allow female children to inherit the throne.
Ligne n°75 : ...alexoloughlin- Ligne n°76 : It would send those Tory bigoted back benchers into a tail spin. Even if there were a gay monarch and he or she married, it wouldn’t be in the Anglican church because it’s opposed to same-sex marriage. I would gloat and rejoice if that were ever to happen.
Ligne n°77 : Jan 21, 2013 at 8:54 am · @Reply Reply to this comment · ...