The Bill then received comprehensive scuritny during three full days of Committee debate on the floor of the House of Lords. Veteran opponents of equality sought to rename same-sex marriage as civil unions, allow teachers to opt out of teaching facts and enshrine in law that public servants can refuse to serve gay people.
Two amendments on education and schools were then debated. The first, proposed by the Bishop of Leicester, sought to provide 'clarity' for schools of a religious ethos about discussing same-sex marriage. This amendment was wholly unnecessary as it duplicated existing guidance which gives religious schools freedom to express their views on such issues. The Bishop of Leicester withdrew the amendment.
The second amendment, proposed by Earl Listowel, sought 'evidence-based' guidance to be sent to schools on the 'implication' of same-sex marriage on children. In his speech in support of the amendment Earl Listowel made gravely offensive statements about the 'risks' posed to children of same-sex parents. Stonewall strongly opposed this clear 'son of Section 28' amendment. Following a long debate the Earl of Listowel withdrew the amendment.
Lord Singh then proposed an amendment that sought to hold a referendum on same-sex marriage before the next general election. We strongly opposed this amendment which is both unnecessary but also had significant financial, and democratic, implications. After another lengthy debate Lord Singh withdrew the amendment.