[bionewslogo3.gif] Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free Log in Advanced Search ____________________ (BUTTON) [bionewslogo3.gif] (BUTTON) * Home * Articles NewsCommentReviews * Events * Jobs & opportunities * Newsletter ArchiveCurrent editionSubscribe * Topics * Glossary * Support us Donating timeFinancial support * Advertising & sponsorship * About us ObjectivesBackgroundReader testimonialsPeople * Contact us * Write for us Writing articlesWriting scheme * Search * Help & FAQs * Account Log in Register (BUTTON) Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook ISMAAR Symposium 2020, Saturday 22 February, Copenhagen Comment Page URL: https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_94944 Trying to right the wrong for donor conceived children 2 March 2015 By Merry Varney and Jemma Dally Appeared in BioNews 792 From April 2009, certain procedural steps have been required to ensure non-birth parents of donor conceived children, who are not married to or in a civil partnership with the birth parent, become the legal parent of their child. These requirements include ensuring that all parents are given information about legal parenthood and that if consent is given by both parents to the non-birth parent becoming a legal parent, this consent is given in writing and signed before insemination. Each parent must also be offered counselling before the treatment and their decision to accept or reject this offer documented in the medical records. Unfortunately, a recent audit by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) discovered that 50 clinics - that is over half of those licensed to carry out treatments using donor gametes or embryos - reported anomalies with their practices and procedures in respect of the signing of the consent forms for legal parenthood. This could have the devastating result of child's non-birth parent not in fact being considered as a parent in law, despite the intention of the couple receiving treatment. In a recent response to a Freedom of Information Act request, the HFEA confirmed that the various errors by clinics included: * Lack of 'Consent to being the legal parent' forms (PP) - and/or 'Consent to your partner being the legal parent' (WP) forms being completed. * PP/WP consent forms completed and/or dated after treatment began rather than before treatment. * Incorrectly completed PP/WP consent forms, such as not being signed and/or dated correctly, completed by the incorrect person, forms not fully completed, or some missing pages. * No evidence in the clinics records of an offer of counselling prior to completion of consents. All of these errors are likely to mean the non-birth parent is not a legal parent of their child. Parents who are in this situation should have received a letter from the clinic where they were treated to inform them of this devastating news and encouraging them to seek legal advice. As the law stands the only option to rectify the position is for both parents to adopt their child. However this would only be an option for parents who are still in a relationship and is not be open to parents who are now separated. Many parents in this situation feel strongly that adoption is not the right solution for their family. Adoption is lifelong and the effect of an adoption order transforms the relationship between the child and non-biological parent. Adoption in this situation does not reflect the child's identity as a donor-conceived child or the reality of the child's experience of family life. Merry Varney at Leigh Day and Jemma Dally at Goodman Ray Solicitors are working jointly to assist families in this situation. Jemma Dally is currently involved in an application in the family court, which if successful will mean that families in this situation will be able to secure the legal parental status of the non birth parent without the child having to be adopted. Some people may think why does this matter and simply ignore the letter they have received from their clinic. They are correct as long as no one asks any questions and the relationship between the parents remains solid; but, if the worst happens and any dispute arises about the arrangements for the child, the issues become very real if one 'parent' is actually not recognised as a parent at all. It is therefore very important that people react to the letter they have received from their clinic and should contact specialist lawyers to take advice on their own situation. Legal action may be necessary and the costs of this should be met by the clinic at which treatment was received. You may also be entitled to reimbursement for the costs of the treatment you received. SOURCES & REFERENCES RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE Judge criticises HFEA consent forms 22 August 2016 - by Antony Starza-Allen A High Court judge has questioned aspects of the consent process for fertility treatment in a ruling in which he made a declaration of parentage in respect of a child born following IVF... 'Widespread incompetence' across the fertility sector, says senior judge 14 September 2015 - by Antony Starza-Allen The President of the Family Division, Sir James Munby, has spoken of 'widespread incompetence' in the fertility sector and has questioned the adequacy of the regulatory framework overseen by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority... Book Review: Modern Families - Parents and Children in New Family Forms 26 May 2015 - by Antony Starza-Allen Susan Golombok's 'Modern Families: Parents and Children in New Family Forms' challenges the assumption that the traditional nuclear family is the best environment in which to raise children... Lost in translation? Converting statutory criteria into clinic practice 23 March 2015 - by Marisa Allman The recent case of X v Y v CRM highlights the potential legal difficulties for children born via assisted conception of clinic error. A recent audit by the HFEA discovered that 50 out of 75 clinics nationwide reported anomalies in respect of the signing or keeping of forms for legal parenthood... Breaches of the HFEA's donor 'ten family' limit - who should be told what? 19 January 2015 - by Professor Eric Blyth and Dr Marilyn Crawshaw Freedom of Information requests and email correspondence reveal the HFEA's singular lack of coherence as regards breaches of its family-limit policy... Too many fertility clinics fall short when it comes to counselling 14 April 2014 - by Ruth Wilde and Sophia Parsons The British Infertility Counselling Association recently collaborated with Infertility Network UK on a short survey to get a snapshot of the patient experience of counselling in licensed centres. The results reveal some worrying findings about both the offer and provision of counselling from clinics... HFEA will not appeal frozen sperm ruling 17 March 2014 - by Nishat Hyder Beth Warren's legal battle to keep her late husband's frozen sperm has finally ended following the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority's announcement that it will not appeal the High Court ruling in Mrs Warren's favour... UK surrogacy gone wrong 17 March 2014 - by Louisa Ghevaert A recent case made national headlines for being a 'do it yourself' surrogacy arrangement which ended in marital breakdown and legal chaos, but news reports did not fully address the complex issues raised in the case about the identity and best interests of the child... Woman launches legal fight for comatose fiancé's sperm 20 January 2014 - by Ayesha Ahmad The partner of a man left in a coma after suffering a series of heart attacks is to take her request to obtain and store his sperm to the High Court.... HAVE YOUR SAY Log in to add a Comment. By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions __________________________________________________________________ Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story. IFRAME: _atssh422 </body> (BUTTON) Advertise your products and services HERE - click for further details IFRAME: //rcm-eu.amazon-adsystem.com/e/cm?t=wwwbionewsorg-21&o=2&p=40&l=ur1&cat egory=amazon_logo&banner=0CHCRDADJ9X2JZB23E02&f=ifr Good Fundraising Code Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation Advertising & sponsorship Terms & conditions Progress Educational Trust, 140 Grays Inn Road, London WC1X 8AX, UK Tel: +44 (0)20 7278 7870 Email: admin@progress.org.uk Limited company registered in England and Wales no 7405980 Registered charity no 1139856 Website developed and built by Ultimate Database Ltd. Website initial design by Thunder Progress Educational Trust © 1992, 2020 Progress Educational Trust © 1992, 2020